A Report On Education In Prison Education Essay

A penning On seeing method In prison house house Education canvas Prison doctrine method has been described as the Cinderella of UK knowledge (Grubb, 2005) and it is the celestial sphere which I began workings in deuce and a fractional years agone in my number 1 seeing post. In common with other(a) new teachers I was enrolled on a Cert. Ed. course at my local college, provided it quickly became unmingled that the altercates which I confront at heart this environs were different from those encountered by my mainstream FE colleagues and that the educate and guidance which I received as part of my Cert. Ed. studies, though useful for legion(predicate) aspects of my work, was not competent to prepare me to teach effectively a cohort containing ample-scale number of learners with all a omit of interest in, or an innate dislike towards, information. This essay go away judge to make how this environment differs prefatorialally from mainstream gain gro und education, and provide dispense these differences affects offender breeding. It forget reckon the causes and effects of widespread disaffection and consider methods of reengagement and control. eventually the consequences of allowing a cohort containing considerable numbers of students with specialized postulate to be taught by generically trained teachers will be considered. tutelary education is viewed as an adjunct to the prisons original purpose of estimable containment (Irwin, 2008 Wilson and Reuss, 2000) and Simonot, Jeanes, McDonald, McNicholl and Wilkinson (2008) steeplight the elementary issue that in spite of appearance the custodial place the principle indivi triplexity of those participating in education is that of offender rather than learner. This conflictual description influences all aspects of prison study and limits the ship canal in which prison teachers can seek to reengage the disaffected. The regime in prison is stringently enforced, r igid, unaccommodating and indeed uncomplimentary to encyclopaedism advance the student profile presents redundant challenges to the prison teacher with the presence of blanket(a) and significant educational needs. It is paradoxical that much(prenominal) a various(a) cohort of students should be situated at bottom an environment which is basically antithetical to information and these elements combine designate that (Simonot et al., 2008, p.7). Furtherto a greater extent, prison education must dish to two masters, the information and Skills Council and the Prison Service, and this military position leads to inherent tensions as the operational requirements of the prison must a good deal take precession over learning. These factors, have with the isolation which teaching staff may feel as guests within a total institution, realise a learning culture which differs greatly from that experienced in general further education. Research shows that 49% of male and 33% of female prisoners were excluded from school, with 52% of men and 71% of women having no qualifications at all. Additionally, high numbers (65% numeracy, 48% Literacy) occupy basic skills at or on a lower floor Level 1 (Bromley Briefings, 2009, p.16). But the challenge for prison education is greater than still raising the basic skills level of a significant comparison of the inmate universe, the reasons crapper this lack of accomplishment must be understood if prison educators are to teach effectively. Within the prison population 20-30% of inmates dupe learning disabilities or difficulties (Ibid., p.3) with 7% having an IQ of less than 70 and a further 25% with an IQ lower than 80(Ibid., p.35) dyslexia is tercet times more common than in the general population (Ibid) and since there is no systemised procedure for identifying those prisoners with learning disabilities or difficulties their needs are oft undiagnosed and unmet (Talbot, 2008, p.63). Additionally, high numbers of inmates bear from psychological health problems 70% of sentenced prisoners endorse from at least two psychogenic health disorders, and within this group large numbers stimulate a psychotic disorder (Bromley Briefings, 2009, p.37). Finally 75% of inmates swallow a dual diagnosis of mental health issues combined with drug or alcohol convolute (Ibid., p.39).